• Hello Guest, welcome to the initial stages of our new platform!
    You can find some additional information about where we are in the process of migrating the board and setting up our new software here

    Thank you for being a part of our community!

1994 945 Turbo Ultimate DD Build

So happy this car went to the right home! After filling this car twice with both material valuables and my kids during evacuations to flee raging wildfires that burned half my property, this is a fitting tribute to its heart!

Well done!
Thank you, Shane! It's in good hands 🙂
 
Got my head back from the machine shop!

I told them that I wanted the valve throats opened up to match the larger seat cut, but they just did a 60* cut without actually making the throat larger. I felt the price was fair for the work I had done, so instead of taking it back and waiting I took the valves out and carefully opened them up with a carbide burr bit.

Moral of the story, tell your machinist precisely what you want with dimensions. In my case, I opened the intake throats to 40.5mm and the exhaust throats to 33.4mm.

I measured the volumes of the combustion chambers when I got it back, they were all within .5cc, approximately 46cc. I was aiming for 45cc but (I think) I didn't take into account that the new valves would sit lower in the seat when the seat is the proper size.

Old SCR 8.5:1
Old DCR 7.7:1 (cam at 0*)

New SCR: 9.1:1
New DCR: 8.3:1 (cam at 0*)


Milled .053"

Bvx3oET.jpg

FBlCSVa.jpg



Stock size throat with seats cut for 46/38 valves:

7bETaDK.jpg



After enlarging the throats:

J1cc9As.jpg



Valves/cam re-installed

YOkM420.jpg



At max lift:

gB3LsLx.jpg

kkDMvY7.jpg

exclnSD.jpg
 
I couldn't find a valve stem height spec from Volvo for the machinist, the greenbook just shows a special go/no-go tool that lays in the camshaft journal to check the installed valve stem height. Thankfully Culberro was able to give me a real spec: 1.015"-1.025" below the valve cover rail should put the valves within the most common shim range, 3.9-4.1mm

Perhaps the new valves are a few tenths of a millimeter shorter than the original ones, but I needed to order some larger shims than what I had laying around. I don't think they could have cut the seats much lower without getting into the head itself.

The left column is current shims, middle is lash clearance, right column is shim needed.

X2FuSDq.jpg
 
I was hoping to get the car running this weekend but my shims won't be here until next week. Went ahead and installed the new head and reassembled everything I can without them.

bgw2B5q.jpg



New hardware/freshened up:

vKkEXRL.jpg
C7SDRC4.jpg
SNOC4X4.jpg

ugys8qd.jpg



The 90+ was cracked of course. I did my best to repair the cracks with silicon bronze. You can see my ugly silicon bronze mig braze on the top of the collector. I don't want to share my repair method until it's been tested :-P New P2 turbo gaskets installed

W0Sutc5.jpg
sZKTwJG.jpg



Fresh studs for the intake and thermostat housing:

9C7TjbE.jpg



New timing belt, tensioner, tensioner spring. Just waiting on shims now!

7r2YHPE.jpg
 
Had the valve cover painted with base/clear, then I sanded through the lettering with 320 grit on a firm sanding block in one direction.
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20240306_202422503.jpg
    PXL_20240306_202422503.jpg
    595.4 KB · Views: 16
Do you think the 90+ exhaust will meet your power goals? Already got a nice 3" downpipe thru at least the CAT?

FWIW, there are nice Swedish custom exhaust headers that fit the 7/9 chassis. With all the head work you've completed, you might find the exhaust manifold as the next resistor. Great work, you are doing things RIGHT which is refreshing.
 
Do you think the 90+ exhaust will meet your power goals? Already got a nice 3" downpipe thru at least the CAT?

FWIW, there are nice Swedish custom exhaust headers that fit the 7/9 chassis. With all the head work you've completed, you might find the exhaust manifold as the next resistor. Great work, you are doing things RIGHT which is refreshing.

Yep, it's 3" from turbo to tailpipe.

I'm sure both the intake and exhaust manifolds are restrictions at this point, but I don't love the idea of changing the mounting location of the turbo. I've toyed with the idea of making a jig with my spare 90+ and building a tubular mild steel manifold that is the same dimensions.

I don't have a power goal in mind but I hope this will put me near 350whp, which means I'll probably need to look into a stronger transmission next....
 
I'm sure both the intake and exhaust manifolds are restrictions at this point, but I don't love the idea of changing the mounting location of the turbo.......

I don't have a power goal in mind but I hope this will put me near 350whp, which means I'll probably need to look into a stronger transmission next....
You can reduce restriction on the intake side with the B21 KJet intake; runners are 3~5mm larger than the stock B230 late intake. Plenum is quite large.....a few tricks to installing into a 7/9 but it can be done. If you decide to go this route, I've got several in the hoard so shoot me a PM.

My gut says the B21 intake will definitely move the restriction to the 90+. If you search, Nathan built some tubular steel replacements for the 90+, although unknown how many. SquareD had one, so you could shoot him a line to see where it went.

Don't know exactly where the AW71 starts to fail from the additonal torque. Folks here have blown them up, so empirical evidence is on record. Lankku has put some BIG numbers thru the 1041 Dana so that won't give up the ghost first.
 
. If you decide to go this route, I've got several in the hoard so shoot me a PM.

Thank you for the offer, but I think when I go for a better intake I'll go with a big plenum style from KL racing.

Whether it's the kjet intake or a aftermarket it's a fair amount of work to get everything working, and a plenum intake has a lot more headroom.
 
Got the correct shims and got the car running on Tuesday :cool:

I noticed that the new OEM cam seal has a slightly smaller ID than the Elring. I've used Elring cam seals before without issue, but the Volvo one looks like it has a better/larger sealing surface to the camshaft.

In the 4th photo you can see how the tensioner fits with the head decked .053", it's definitely approaching the limit of the tensioner's effective range. I don't think the belt will stretch enough to max out the tensioner but I'm going to double check after I get some miles on the car.

QQA0BpN.jpg
UimchDu.jpg



Custom cam lock tool for torquing the cam gear

CaJuMrF.jpg


wVnmvMC.jpg



Ready to run :cool:

lJWWpqw.jpg
 
You could also grind a flat on the near side of that belt tensioner stud once the belt stretches a bit (however HTD belts are quite good; very commonly used in power transmission in industry). If all that stud does is hold the tensioner solid, you'll be good. Looking forward to seeing the head's movement of your previous torque curve.
 
 
Back
Top